The Predator's Delta-E score of 4.7 (0 is ideal) is worse than the average (2.2), as well as the scores for the Strix (1.6), the Leopard Pro (0.3) and the Legion (0.2) The colors aren't the most accurate, either. The Predator's display covers 81 percent of the sRGB color gamut, surpassing the Legion (68 percent) but falling below the 15-inch laptop average (94 percent), the Strix (122 percent) and the Leopard Pro (165 percent). Some fires during a space battle looked more orange than red, but it otherwise looked accurate. ![]() ![]() In dark areas, I wished I could bump up the brightness, but in lighter parts of the game, I could see fine. If it has to be a similarly high performance, you might also take a look at the MSI Vector, which consumes slightly less power at an almost similarly high performance.I had a similar experience in Mass Effect: Andromeda. Although it doesn't offer the same amount of brute performance, it also remains relatively quiet and cool. ![]() Even though this is achieved with the usual disadvantages, those modes are optional.Īmong the competitors, the Razer Blade 17 recommends itself. The Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317 offers a good display and even two overclocking modes with correspondingly powerful performance. Then the Helios 300 won't be any louder than the competitors. On the other hand, overclocking is optional, and those who like it quieter and can live with a few less frames per second can also switch to the significantly more moderate Standard mode. It is also able to prevail against the panel in Blade 17.Īn overclocked gaming laptop - or its user - also has to struggle with the usual disadvantages we mentioned above. However, the good performance isn't all, and the fairly good display also surprises us with 97% coverage of the DisplayP3 color space. The Predator is large, heavy, and loud, but also offers plenty of performance according to gamers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |